rabbit
07-10-03, 01:38 PM
http://www.canoe.ca/Slam030710/car_cart2-sun.html
Given the chance to design a new CART, Pollock said the first thing he would do is change the name.
"Maybe the American Grand Prix Series or the Formula America Series," he said.
Why do we need to change the name? Part of the reason CART can't seem to build any brand awareness is because it keeps reinventing itself: CART, IndyCar, CART again, Champ Car. Stick with something and promote the heck out of it!
Pollock would incorporate some of the more successful F-1 formats, such as a standing start and one-lap qualifying.Standing starts might be okay, especially with as much trouble as we've had this year getting races started (see also Portland)
Pollock also would reduce the CART calendar from its 19 dates to a more manageable 14. I don't think we need to reduce the number of races, unless it's the only way teams can afford to stay in the series. Cutting races should only be used as a survival tool. It does absolutely nothing to improve the product. In fact, it does more damage to the product than good. Part of NASCAR's success has come from the fact it races every single week. If you go to NASCAR.com you don't get popup ads telling you when the next race is and where it will be on TV. The next race in on Sunday and it will be on either NBC or Fox, depending on what time of year it is.
Pollock has managed to suck as a team owner in two different series. He's given bad advice ("Take the BAR ride, Jacques!") to his biggest client and effectively ruined his career. I don't think this is the guy I want running CART. :thumdown:
Given the chance to design a new CART, Pollock said the first thing he would do is change the name.
"Maybe the American Grand Prix Series or the Formula America Series," he said.
Why do we need to change the name? Part of the reason CART can't seem to build any brand awareness is because it keeps reinventing itself: CART, IndyCar, CART again, Champ Car. Stick with something and promote the heck out of it!
Pollock would incorporate some of the more successful F-1 formats, such as a standing start and one-lap qualifying.Standing starts might be okay, especially with as much trouble as we've had this year getting races started (see also Portland)
Pollock also would reduce the CART calendar from its 19 dates to a more manageable 14. I don't think we need to reduce the number of races, unless it's the only way teams can afford to stay in the series. Cutting races should only be used as a survival tool. It does absolutely nothing to improve the product. In fact, it does more damage to the product than good. Part of NASCAR's success has come from the fact it races every single week. If you go to NASCAR.com you don't get popup ads telling you when the next race is and where it will be on TV. The next race in on Sunday and it will be on either NBC or Fox, depending on what time of year it is.
Pollock has managed to suck as a team owner in two different series. He's given bad advice ("Take the BAR ride, Jacques!") to his biggest client and effectively ruined his career. I don't think this is the guy I want running CART. :thumdown: