Time for DW to get a clue...

[RTKar]

Watching the Cup race....DW say's something like, "Late in the race attrition on the engines ...blah blah blah....I watched the Formula 1 race and they only go about an hour and a half...Our engines are turning 9000 RPM's for 500 miles!...the SAME engine!"

Get a clue DW...18000 rpm's, shifting, braking, WITH the new F1 engine rules.

[rabbit]

:shakehead What a maroon.

By the way...
Sunday's NASCAR race: 7 Caution Flags for 45 laps
Sunday's F1 race: 0 Caution Flags for 0 laps

[scanman]

Hey, wait till the twirl starts that crap....same thing :shakehead

[JT265]

:shakehead What a maroon.

By the way...
Sunday's NASCAR race: 7 Caution Flags for 45 laps
Sunday's F1 race: 0 Caution Flags for 0 laps

One "boogity" too many, my guess.

[Hard Driver]

Yea them high tech carborators and lifters are certainly no match for the F1 computer controls and pnuematic lifters. I'm sure the NASCAR guys could spin at 18,0000 if they wanted to. :rolleyes:

[rabbit]

:shakehead What a maroon.

By the way...
Sunday's NASCAR race: 7 Caution Flags for 45 laps
Sunday's F1 race: 0 Caution Flags for 0 lapsTo clarify my post, the point is not that F1 driver are superior to NASCAR drivers because they crash less. I was merely pointing out that the engines are cranking 18K without a break, vs. 9K with seven breaks.

[pchall]

To clarify my post, the point is not that F1 driver are superior to NASCAR drivers because they crash less. I was merely pointing out that the engines are cranking 18K without a break, vs. 9K with seven breaks.


I would take it to be some sort of sideways praise for the Toyota NASCRAP engine shilled by a short bus guy.

boogity, boogity, toyboogity

[pinniped]

He's just trying to make the four or five guys that bought Grand Prixs or Monte Carlos because they look like stock cars feel better about their low tech sleds