View Full Version : R-10 Fastest On Day Two...
...almost a second faster than last year's pole. It is quiet (good for street races) with no smoke. That doesn't compare with the Diesels I see every day!
Rocketdoc
01-25-06, 06:34 PM
...almost a second faster than last year's pole. It is quiet (good for street races) with no smoke. That doesn't compare with the Diesels I see every day!
I think that the engine comes in at 816 lb./ft. of torque from about 3000-5000 RPM.
Ouch1
nz_climber
01-25-06, 11:34 PM
I think that the negine comes in at 816 lb./ft. of torque from about 3000-5000 RPM.
Ouch1
link (http://www.audi.com/audi/com/en1/experience/motorsport/r10.html)
the article on audi web site mentions 1100 newton meters of torque, so you folks not in metric can work it out... what ever it is, that alot of torque's :)
cameraman
01-26-06, 03:25 AM
1100 newton meters = 811.36 lb ft
Looks like everyone is using the same values, imagine that.
chop456
01-26-06, 03:29 AM
...almost a second faster than last year's pole. It is quiet (good for street races) with no smoke. That doesn't compare with the Diesels I see every day!
FWIW, last year's pole was a practice time.
Methanolandbrats
01-26-06, 11:22 AM
...almost a second faster than last year's pole. It is quiet (good for street races) with no smoke. That doesn't compare with the Diesels I see every day! The TDI will smoke at full throttle because it's slightly overfueled then. The R10 is using particle traps to minimize that.
Wheel-Nut
01-26-06, 05:40 PM
I sure hope they bring the R-10 to Houston. :thumbup:
extramundane
01-26-06, 09:14 PM
I sure hope they bring the R-10 to Houston. :thumbup:
I wouldn't start that breath-holding campaign any time soon. Unless something changes, Sebring's the only place you'll see an R10 on American soil 'til at least July.
Rocketdoc
01-27-06, 01:27 AM
1100 newton meters = 811.36 lb ft
Looks like everyone is using the same values, imagine that.
Oops, I was off by 5 lb./ft.; so sue me.
cameraman
01-27-06, 02:06 PM
Oops, I was off by 5 lb./ft.; so sue me.
What I said was everyone is using (roughly) the same value. Sheesh.
A mistake like that could cause a serious accident somewhere. I watch "Engineering Nightmare Disasters" ya know! :p
Rocketdoc
01-27-06, 06:09 PM
[QUOTE=cameraman]What I said was everyone is using (roughly) the same value. Sheesh.[/QUOTE
Only kidding.
I just did a quick paper trick.
You would be surprised at how many mistakes are made in the spaceship business because of "mixed units".
Hameroids
01-29-06, 03:13 AM
Yeah, I need those too!
a shartguard?
chop456
01-30-06, 07:49 AM
You would be surprised at how many mistakes are made in the spaceship business because of "mixed units".
Isn't that what the ESA Beagle probe's extra deluxe high-speed Mars landing was attributed to?
Rocketdoc
01-30-06, 09:59 PM
Isn't that what the ESA Beagle probe's extra deluxe high-speed Mars landing was attributed to?
Yeah, I think you're right.
NASA demands that we (outside spaceship houses) use SI units, but when we meet, we always use US units (inches, lbf, hogsheads, etc.) including the NASA dewds.
I wonder why we get confused....
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.