PDA

View Full Version : R-10 Fastest On Day Two...



NismoZ
01-25-06, 06:14 PM
...almost a second faster than last year's pole. It is quiet (good for street races) with no smoke. That doesn't compare with the Diesels I see every day!

Rocketdoc
01-25-06, 06:34 PM
...almost a second faster than last year's pole. It is quiet (good for street races) with no smoke. That doesn't compare with the Diesels I see every day!

I think that the engine comes in at 816 lb./ft. of torque from about 3000-5000 RPM.

Ouch1

nz_climber
01-25-06, 11:34 PM
I think that the negine comes in at 816 lb./ft. of torque from about 3000-5000 RPM.

Ouch1

link (http://www.audi.com/audi/com/en1/experience/motorsport/r10.html)

the article on audi web site mentions 1100 newton meters of torque, so you folks not in metric can work it out... what ever it is, that alot of torque's :)

cameraman
01-26-06, 03:25 AM
1100 newton meters = 811.36 lb ft

Looks like everyone is using the same values, imagine that.

chop456
01-26-06, 03:29 AM
...almost a second faster than last year's pole. It is quiet (good for street races) with no smoke. That doesn't compare with the Diesels I see every day!

FWIW, last year's pole was a practice time.

Methanolandbrats
01-26-06, 11:22 AM
...almost a second faster than last year's pole. It is quiet (good for street races) with no smoke. That doesn't compare with the Diesels I see every day! The TDI will smoke at full throttle because it's slightly overfueled then. The R10 is using particle traps to minimize that.

NismoZ
01-26-06, 05:27 PM
Yeah, I need those too!

Wheel-Nut
01-26-06, 05:40 PM
I sure hope they bring the R-10 to Houston. :thumbup:

extramundane
01-26-06, 09:14 PM
I sure hope they bring the R-10 to Houston. :thumbup:

I wouldn't start that breath-holding campaign any time soon. Unless something changes, Sebring's the only place you'll see an R10 on American soil 'til at least July.

Rocketdoc
01-27-06, 01:27 AM
1100 newton meters = 811.36 lb ft

Looks like everyone is using the same values, imagine that.


Oops, I was off by 5 lb./ft.; so sue me.

cameraman
01-27-06, 02:06 PM
Oops, I was off by 5 lb./ft.; so sue me.

What I said was everyone is using (roughly) the same value. Sheesh.

NismoZ
01-27-06, 02:59 PM
A mistake like that could cause a serious accident somewhere. I watch "Engineering Nightmare Disasters" ya know! :p

Rocketdoc
01-27-06, 06:09 PM
[QUOTE=cameraman]What I said was everyone is using (roughly) the same value. Sheesh.[/QUOTE

Only kidding.

I just did a quick paper trick.

You would be surprised at how many mistakes are made in the spaceship business because of "mixed units".

Hameroids
01-29-06, 03:13 AM
Yeah, I need those too!

a shartguard?

chop456
01-30-06, 07:49 AM
You would be surprised at how many mistakes are made in the spaceship business because of "mixed units".

Isn't that what the ESA Beagle probe's extra deluxe high-speed Mars landing was attributed to?

Rocketdoc
01-30-06, 09:59 PM
Isn't that what the ESA Beagle probe's extra deluxe high-speed Mars landing was attributed to?


Yeah, I think you're right.

NASA demands that we (outside spaceship houses) use SI units, but when we meet, we always use US units (inches, lbf, hogsheads, etc.) including the NASA dewds.

I wonder why we get confused....